Canterbury University had a problem. Their music school was too small and too noisy and run down. It lacked modern facilities for its performance students and it needed a new home. There was plenty of space to build a new school and conservatorium on their very own land at Ilam, but the Tertiary Education Grants Board could not provide enough funds for the new music school as well as all the other projects on the University’s wish list.
Meanwhile, the Arts Centre Trust Board also had a problem: how nice it would be to have an easy source of money to help pay for its programmes and maintain its heritage buildings! Thus the Chairman had a bright idea to offer its Hereford Street car-park site to the University in return for 50 years of rental income.
The University said “Yes please and thank you very much and we’d like other space in your buildings too, because the car-park site isn’t really big enough for us”.
The Arts Centre Trust Board said “No problem. We will get rid of some pesky little church mice tenants to make space available to such a prestigious and trustworthy tenant”. This enabled the Board to all breath a sigh of relief that they would not have to work so hard to get money from other places for the Arts Centre.
Now the University had no money to build its new piece of music school. So cunningly and between the mayoral office and the Vice Chancellors office a deal with the Christchurch City Council was hatched where they would rent the land and build the building for the University. The City’s C.E.O. Captain Marryatt, his staff, accountants and lawyers met the Mayor, Commander Parker. Behind closed doors they nutted out a scheme to be both developer and the landlord to the University, and then for a minimum rent the Arts Centre Trust Board would play the part of landlord to the Christchurch City Council.
The University was pleased to know it would get its Conservatorium much sooner than if it stayed at Ilam and built on its own land. The Vice Chancellor, a previous business man and accountant, told everyone “This is great and to make sure no-one opposes us, we will drop our already approved architectural plans from the 1990s for Ilam, and go with the noted architect Sir Miles Warren’s design for the proposed building. Our P.R. experts will write a lovely story about the Arts Centre being our Spiritual Home, we can talk about ‘Town and gown’ and our music staff will be pleased to have fine new facilities. It will also sound high class if we rebrand the music department as a National Conservatorium. The students will just have to lump carting their instruments and themselves between Ilam and the CBD, finding places to park their cars and then take their instruments up to the first floor. Everything will be hunky-dory!”
The Mayor’s Office supported the Vice Chancellor and helped by getting business men to wax lyrical in The Press about the idea of Town and Gown and how much a handful of about a hundred or so students would revitalize the city centre. The CPIT already have helped in the east with their 15,000 students spending their student loans. There may even have been mention of how getting the City Council’s foot in the door on such a valuable city centre site as the Arts Centre might in time reap great benefits not only as a car park but also further accommodation for City Hall in the very next block, (but this was not noised abroad!).
Current tenants of the Arts Centre, whose hard work and renovations of the old stone premises had given the city centre a much admired vitality over the years, got wind of what their Trust Board was up to – especially when their new rent demands came in complete with gagging clauses so they never disagreed with their land lord in public. They then began to question the principle of having a bulky great university building, with access denied to most Christchurch citizens, in a key area of the precious little spare space left for future Arts Centre development. This seemed very unwise.
Ripples of alarm and discontent began to spread, John Simpson, Arts Centre Trust Board chairman ( and former University Councillor) decreed that anyone who was against the idea was biased and had a conflict of interest. He went further and applied this to his dissenting Board members (now all appointed, no longer freely elected), excluding them from debates, votes and even from attending Board meetings. Out at Ilam, the University Council held their meetings on the topic in committee and the minutes were never available to inquiring reporters. In Tuam Street, after considerable public pressure to bring things out into the open, the Christchurch City Council agreed to have a special public consultation on the matter, not on the principles at stake or the wisdom of the project, only on the financial aspects.
Although the three entities involved are all funded by the public purse, not one has had the grace or wit to think past present matters of accountancy and can it be achieved without telling anyone. The University used what it calls, its “spiritual” right to occupy Arts Centre land, totally ignoring the “spiritual” rights of all Christchurch citizens to whom Norman Kirk and his government gifted the site to be used as an Arts Centre. The Arts Centre Trust Board used financial expediency as an excuse to save it the trouble of keeping the vision of the Arts Centre Founders intact. The Mayor and many of his Councillors behaved like foxes in a hen-house to get control over a prime piece of real estate.
So, how does the story end? How does the Arts Centre Trust Board limit the damage done to the Arts Centre by allowing the University and the Christchurch City Council to occupy any part of its valuable site? Unfortunately, when commercial interests and developers join hands with City Hall and City Hall joins hands with the academic Ivory Tower, the values that built our Arts Centre to enrich the lives of citizens and visitors alike, get thrown on the scrap heap. The needs of ordinary people to participate democratically can go to hell in a handcart. If one of the three bodies in this unholy alliance does not stop holding hands, the only music to come out of this story will be the death knell at the funeral of our Arts Centre.
Anon. 12.09.09
1 comment:
It is important that people like you keep writing, whoever you are, this is the most sensible blog on the entire site. I have posted a comment in other areas on this site saying that I believe people need to branch out as well as be part of SOAC. If anybody organises a protest, rally or any other political statement, then the very people we don't want to know what is going to happen will know what is going to happen, and they will work to thwart the date set by organisers. Nobody knew the stall and food people at the arts centre would suddenly get 6 months notice. If the city council/varsity/board of trustees had a website saying what they were going to do, people would have worked in advance to stop them, or find out other information to thwart them. It is pointless doing any serious political organising on this website because the people we are trying to thwart just read it. Good luck, you are fantastic writer. Can you tell me how I can get hold of the gift information regarding Norman Kirk? It is unavailable at Land and Information. My options are possibly the varsity (ha ha ha) or The Ministry Of Education. Information I have received from various departments I have applied to help me understand and try and thwart my enemy have clauses saying I may not distribute the information or allow anybody to peruse it. I just want to know how to get the gift info, and then tell people how to get that info so that nobody is being illegal by showing it to anybody else.
Post a Comment